Search for: "Nation v Jacobs" Results 61 - 80 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2020, 3:16 pm by CAFE
In the full episode, Preet and Anne discuss the latest in the police shooting of Jacob Blake, the Trump administration’s potential Hatch Act violations during the RNC, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in the case of Michael Flynn, holding that the district court could review the DOJ’s move to dismiss all charges against the former national security adviser, and more. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 5:28 am
Contents include:Special Issue on the Political Economy of Managerialism Matthew Eagleton-Pierce & Samuel Knafo, Introduction: the political economy of managerialism Samuel Knafo, Neoliberalism and the origins of public management Leonard Seabrooke & Ole Jacob Sending, Contracting development: managerialism and consultants in intergovernmental organizations Sarah Sharma & Susanne Soederberg, Redesigning the business of development: the case of the World Economic Forum and global… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:27 am by Marie Summerlin Hamm
Professor Brad Jacob will be discussing the “The Constitution and Same-Sex Marriage. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
With its five guiding pillars, the Strategy codifies disparate cybersecurity actions across states and private industry by (i) advocating for legislation to protect national critical infrastructure; (ii) emphasizing threat actor deterrence and detection by officially declaring ransomware as a national security threat; (iii) proposing to shape market activity through government purchasing and proposed legislation; (iv) seeking public-private investment in cybersecurity resilience;… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
This morning the Court of Appeal (Jacob and Sedley LJJ and Norris J) handed down its judgment in Nokia v IPCom [2011] EWCA Civ 6.By way of back story: IPCom (described in the judgment as a “non practising entity”, i.e. a patentee with no business of its own in products covered by the patents), owned a number of patents (which it had bought from Bosch) in the field of mobile communications technology. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Primedia Broadcasting v Speaker of National Assembly ([2015] ZAWCHC 72), the South African National Editors’ Forum and non-governmental organisations challenged two restrictions. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:19 am
Contents include:Niels Blokker, General Introduction Marie-Clotide Runavot, The Intergovernmental Organization and the Institutionalization of International Relations: The Modelling of International Organization at Stake Angela Di Stasi, About Soft International Organizations: An Open Question Piero Pennetta, International Regional Organizations: Problems and Issues Alessandro Polsi, Universalism and Regionalism in the History of the United Nations and of Specialized Agencies Giovanni… [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 8:52 am by Christiana Wayne
Air Force Academy, joined Lawfare Managing Editor Jacob Schulz and Fellow in Cybersecurity Law Alvaro Marañon to discuss her recent article on Lawfare, “Ransomware Lessons for a Nation Held Hostage”: powered by Crowdcast Yaya J. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:22 pm by David Leibowitz
My grandfather Jacob was born in Romania. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Two recent decisions, Economou v de Freitas and Doyle v Smith, provide some guidance on this question, but seem to pull in slightly different directions. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:41 pm
Jacob LJ, in a leading judgment delivered today in the Court of Appeal in Intel v CPM, has referrred a number of questions on s.5(3) TMA 1994/Art.4(4)(a) Directive 89/104 to the ECJ. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
”[12] The Knick Court also found support for its holding in the body of takings jurisprudence, including Jacobs v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The CJEU followed A-G Jacobs's logic and when the cases returned to Laddie J he applied the reasoning and held that the claimants would be entitled to damages. [read post]