Search for: "Nation v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 46,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
And I illustrate this logic at work in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Randy Kennedy at Harvard Law, one of the nation’s most eminent African-American law professors (and a liberal to boot) has been prominent in explaining and relying on that distinction. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Far more interesting has been the effects within the domains of Latin American politics, especially among the CELAC states (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) including Cuba--the competitor organization to the OAS (Organization of American States) including the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
EU policymakers will not immediately consider addressing the alleged TikTok issues over national security and sensitive data protection concerns that have prompted the change in US law. [read post]