Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less,… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:33 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Cir. 2001), were overruled by Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See T-MOBILE USA, INC. v.Huawei Device USA, Inc., 115 F.Supp.3d 1184 (2015) (DTSA/UTSA case).Example 2. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
Shell Oil Products Company; Shell Oil Products Company v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
He claims the taking occurred as a result of the acts of Susan Walker, a biologist and regional director with the National Marine Fisheries Service (`NMFS’) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (`NOAA’), a division within the United States Department of Commerce. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:03 am
Stated differently, the party seeking the production `must clear three hurdles: (1) relevancy; (2) admissibility; (3) specificity. [read post]