Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Grant" Results 141 - 160 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Healthcare or other employers should not presume that the EEOC or the courts automatically to accept as obvious or without question that the nature of their business or a particular position disqualifies an individual or class of individuals with a physical or mental disability, past history of injury or illness or other actual or perceived physical or mental limitation automatically for employment in that position. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:30 am by Terry Hart
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 129 S. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) and Chevron deference did not play a large role in the Court’s decision, which was concerned to some extent with IRS regulations. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:08 am by Jason Rantanen
Natural Resources Defense Council decision. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In the face of these developments, health plans and their employer or other sponsors, health plan fiduciaries, health plan vendors acting as business associates and others dealing with health plans and their management should contact legal counsel experienced in these matters for advice and help about evaluating within the scope of attorney-client privilege the implications of the Resolution Agreement and other recent guidance on the adequacy and defensibility of their and their health… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
Murkowski Comments on Final Hydraulic Fracturing Rule Markey: Senate GOP Shouldn't Block Fracking Rule House Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Raúl M. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, No. 2014-1301,Ejusdem generis is mentioned:The PTO contends the interpretative rule ofejusdem generis is inapplicable in this context. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm by Dennis Crouch
”[4]  But the PTAB almost never grants these motions to amend.[5]  Thus, as a practical matter, the agency’s basis for adopting “broadest reasonable interpretation” is illusory. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. applies to preliminary injunctive relief sought in a petition under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, as a majority of circuits have held, or whether an entirely different and profoundly deferential standard applies, as the courts below held. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
We granted certiorari, 513 U.S. 1146, 115 S.Ct. 1092, 130 L.Ed.2d 1061 (1995), and now affirm the judgment, but on a rationale different from that adopted by the State Supreme Court.IIThe State's principal argument in defense of Amendment 2 is that it puts gays and lesbians in the same position as all other persons. [read post]