Search for: "Nelson v Roth"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 3:20 am
We can't tell an awful lot of the facts of the underlying case from the Second Department decision in Nelson v Roth 2010 NY Slip Op 00658 Decided on January 26, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department but we do see the ironic clash of two well known Legal Malpractice defense firms, one acting as a plaintiff's attorney while at the same time defending an attorney in this case. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court also properly determined that although the defendant Miller, Rosado & Algios, LLP, established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the legal malpractice cause of action insofar as asserted by the respondents against it, the respondents raised triable issues of fact in opposition (see Silva v Worby, Groner, Edelman, LLP, 54 AD3d 634; see also Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007; Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d… [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:49 am
Thus, “to prove an attorney-client relationship, there must be an explicit undertaking “to perform a specific task” (Nelson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm
Roth[Affirmed/vacated; Stegall; May 10, 2019]Improper imposition of lifetime postrelease supervisionDissatisfaction with counsel required withdrawal of pleaState v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
Bank & Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 595; Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d 912, 913; Aranki v Goldman & Assoc., LLP, 34 AD3d at 511-512; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909, 910-911). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
Fire, on the other hand (see Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d at 913; Rovello v Klein, 304 AD2d at 638-639). [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:10 am
Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Nelson v Roth 69 AD3d 912, 913). [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
Mohr, Licensed to Practice: The Supreme Court Defines the American Medical Profession (Johns Hopkins University Press) Whitney Strub, Roth v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:03 am
” Steven Nelson of U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
” Roth v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Nelson v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:05 pm
The facts are based upon a famous ethics case—Zimmerman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
