Search for: "Nelson v. District Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 983
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Making or directing others to make public statements about (1) counsel in the case other than the District Attorney, (2) members of the court’s staff and the District Attorney’s staff, or (3) the family members of any counsel, staff member, the Court or the District Attorney, if those statements are made with the intent to materially interfere with, or to cause others to materially interfere with, counsel’s or staff’s work in this… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:14 am
Facts: This case (Nelson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
From Gilley v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 12:50 pm
On March 6, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in the whistleblower retaliation case Lindsey Gulden and Damian Burch v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
” Though Blatt insisted that her interpretation rested directly on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Barnett Bank v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Nelson, J.D.The Eleventh Circuit recently issued a divided opinion in which a three-judge panel unanimously held that Ibrahim Almagarby acted as an unregistered “dealer” under federal securities laws, that the SEC did not violate Almagarby’s due process rights, and that the district court properly ordered disgorgement against Almagarby. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:48 pm
By reversing the trial court’s decision, the Third Appellate District immediately restored the CPPA’s full enforcement authority. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Philpot v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
“The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists’ report of an alleged successful attack on M/V Ocean Jazz is patently false,” the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:54 pm
Two days ago, I somewhat critiqued Judge Nelson's analysis of when circuit precedent is sufficiently inconsistent with a subsequent Supreme Court decision to no longer bind a panel.Today, Judge Bress authors a lengthy opinion that, in my view, is exactly the right way to do about doing precisely that.Personally, I hope (and think) that the defendant will prevail in this trademark dispute, just as it did in the district court and in the Ninth Circuit's… [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the court concluded that the statements were absolutely privileged and Supreme Court had properly granted the Defendants' motions for summary judgment.* In Hemmens v Nelson, 138 NY 517, the Court of Appeals explained "From considerations of public policy and to secure the unembarrassed and efficient administration of justice and public affairs, the law denies to the defamed party any remedy through an action for libel or… [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the court concluded that the statements were absolutely privileged and Supreme Court had properly granted the Defendants' motions for summary judgment.* In Hemmens v Nelson, 138 NY 517, the Court of Appeals explained "From considerations of public policy and to secure the unembarrassed and efficient administration of justice and public affairs, the law denies to the defamed party any remedy through an action for libel or… [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
The mice developed alveologenic adenomas, a rare tumor that is usually benign, not malignant.[12] The Joiner Court recognized that these multiple extrapolations were a bridge to nowhere, and reversed the Court of Appeals, and reinstated the judgment of the district court. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:26 am
" Consider the claim in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:09 am
The District Court for the District of Columbia confirmed the award. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
