Search for: "Nelson v. Harding" Results 41 - 60 of 270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 12:45 pm by Scott Nelson
Nelson Responding to the New York Times’s powerful critique of the Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:26 pm
It's also hard to believe that there's any personal animosity present, or even strong political differences: the majority opinion that Judge Bea slams is written by Judge Callahan, for goodness sakes, and joined by Judge Dorothy Nelson. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  If EPA shuts down, then it can’t give a Title V permit to any power plant in the country. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:22 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Pickering[Affd/Vacd; Johnson; Oct. 24, 2014]Failure to give lesser-included offense instructionsFailure to change venueProsecutorial misconductFailure to allow necessity defenseFailure to give instruction on defense of othersImproper weighing of aggravating and mitigating factors for hard-50Hard-50 is unconstitutional under AlleyneState v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:04 am by Susan Brenner
Nelson did not know Brown or Henderson and she had never given either of them permission to use her credit card. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am by Schachtman
This evidentiary bootstrapping machine was hard at work in the isotretinoin litigation. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Detective Nelson was unable to unlock the cellphone. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Whalen[Affirmed; July 12, 2019]Failure to appoint counsel for motion to correct illegal sentenceFailure to consider departure motion from hard-25 sentenceKedrin Littlejohn v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We have no hard figures, but anecdotal evidence suggests that legal malpractice is held to a higher standard. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
  The only decision was a summary reversal in a Federal sentencing case, Nelson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, Judges Nelson and Berzon asked whether the Supreme Court's 1988 decision in Lyngv. [read post]