Search for: "Nelson v. Sup. Ct." Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is a relationship which is not sporadic but developing and involves a continuity of the professional services from which the alleged malpractice stems” (Frenchman v Queller, Fisher, Dienst, Serrins, Washor & Kool, LLP, 24 Misc 3d 486, 498 [Sup Ct New York Cnty 2009], quoting Muller v Sturman, 79 AD2d 482, 486 [4th Dept 1981]; see Henry v Leeds & Morelli, 4 AD3d 229 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:46 am by Peter J. Sluka
Cohen, in McCormack v Kuras, Index No. 656434/2021 [Sup Ct, New York County] and its related case, Triboss Brooklyn LLC v Kuras, Index No. 654282/2021 [Sup Ct, New York County]). [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Pursuant to Family Ct Act § 532(a), a genetic marker test may not be ordered if it is not in the best interests of the child on the basis of equitable estoppel. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]