Search for: "Nelson v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Nelson, No. 2115 EDA 2021 (Pa. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am
Nelson. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Welcome to this all-source repository of information for analysts, researchers, investigators, journalists, educators, and the public at large. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:13 pm
From Silverman v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
The courts also cause the law to evolve. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
”Four years later, in Gregg v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens made clear: Our new government is founded upon . . . its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
In the case of Grady v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Christine Nelson, Dr. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
’” Nelson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
”[23]They further claim that Congress could reach any interactions that spilled over state lines.[24]Yet Professors Amar and Balkin do not cite anyone during the Constitution’s framing, ratification, or early implementation era who expressed their version of the ICC, which would have given Congress untrammeled power.[25]Rather, they provide an originalist veneer to justify modern liberal legislation.[26] Such verbal ingenuity explains why Professor Levinson shifted gears and concluded… [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:10 pm
’” Nelson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
And he was surely correct in understanding that the equal protection clause must mean that one race never can be superior or subordinate to another. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Family Court granted petitioner’s application. [read post]
