Search for: "New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers Union of Am., AFL-CIO" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor Law New York City Tr. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor LawNew York City Tr. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:24 pm
Auth. v Transport Workers Union of Am., Local 100, 2011 NY Slip Op 07431, Appellate Division, Second Department In 1999 the New York City Transit Authority (“NYCTA”), its subsidiary, the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (“MABSTOA”) and the Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 (“TWU”), entered into a collective bargaining… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, and other decisions. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, and other decisions. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332.Supreme Court had concluded:1. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332.Supreme Court had concluded:1. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the court explained that the arbitration proceeding at issue, which was conducted pursuant to the parties' collective bargaining agreement, was consensual in nature and therefor subject to the limited scope of review established by CPLR §7511. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the court explained that the arbitration proceeding at issue, which was conducted pursuant to the parties' collective bargaining agreement, was consensual in nature and therefor subject to the limited scope of review established by CPLR §7511. [read post]