Search for: "New York v. New York Telephone Co." Results 121 - 140 of 436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
John's University School of Law and New York Law School, commented: "... [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:56 am
Once again, a New York appellate court has pointed out that an insured's subjective assessment and belief that a potential claim would lack legal merit is not the relevant inquiry. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:30 pm
 So off to Google Scholar (New York state court cases) and the AAA's No-Fault Award Service page I went. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm by Mark Bennett
New York Telephone Co., 434 U.S. 159, 172, 98 S.Ct. 364, 372, 54 L.Ed.2d 376 (1977), and In re Application of United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless Telephone, – F.Supp.2d – , 2011 WL 3424470 at *44 (D. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
If you would like to learn more about Labor Law 240, or New York's other construction safety laws, below is a list of the leading interpretive cases from the New York Court of Appeals, with links to each decision. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
The Circuit Court cited New York Telephone Company v Communications Workers of America Local 1100, 256 F.3d 89, as authority for its ruling [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:53 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Finkel We’ve known since the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in General Telephone Company of Southwest v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
  Written decisions from the New York Court of Appeals and four departments of the Appellate Division are always published officially. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Supreme Court, New York County, New York that analyzes an issue involving divorce procedure. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:17 am
HO policies that require residency, however, do not define "reside", causing the New York Court of Appeals in 2012 to conclude that the policy term "residence premises", without a definition of "reside", is ambiguous. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Sprint Communications Co. v. [read post]