Search for: "Nichols v. Backes"
Results 21 - 40
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 4:43 am
In Serafin, Lord Wilson giving judgment for the Supreme Court, held that any ‘reference to a checklist is now inappropriate’, before reverting the case back to trial for a more flexible approach, sensitive to the particular facts of the case [75]. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Several Election Deniers Backed by Trump Prevail in Hotly Contested Primaries MSN – Hannah Knowles (Washington Post) | Published: 8/3/2022 Several election deniers backed by former President Trump prevailed in closely watched primaries on August 2, as a nationwide battle over the future of the GOP played out in state and federal races across five states. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Background: Turning back to the lawsuit, Larkin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:53 am
In Licavoli v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 11:00 pm
The first two authorities, Nichols v Amalgamated Press (1908) Macg Cop Cas (1905-10) 2 166 and Schroeder Music Publishing v Macaulay [1974] 1 WLR 1308 (HL), involved music publishing contracts where the copyright assigned was in a musical composition, depriving the creator of the ability to benefit economically from their creation for the term of the copyright. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
”Which brings us back to Nichols’s insight that we’ve reached the point where “ignorance . . . is an actual value. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 1:54 pm
These were two back-to-back, six month lettings, each at a rental of £3,300 per calendar month. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:41 am
Coalition for Better Government, 901 F.3d 498, 506 n.8 (5th Cir. 2018) (noting Section 1125(a) applies only to "commercial advertising and promotion"); Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Back to Blackstone? [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
Back to Blackstone? [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am
Yesterday, I blogged about the lawsuit by Marc Rotenberg, former head of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, against Politico and Protocol, over a story that discussed Rotenberg's positive COVID test result, and Rotenberg's not immediately informing his staff about the test. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 2:54 pm
Footnote: See Pabon v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:46 pm
Balla v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
