Search for: "Nickel v. Nickel" Results 61 - 80 of 279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2018, 3:42 am by Brian Cordery
Interestingly, in light of the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Lilly having been handed down after the first instance judgment in the present proceedings, Regeneron appears to have argued that even if Kymab was right on construction, there was still infringement under the newly-conceived English law doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Brian Cordery
Floyd LJ also agreed with statements made by Jacob LJ in Markem v Zipher [2005] EWCA Civ 267 that cross-examination on key evidence is important for procedural fairness, not just from the perspective of the parties, but also the witnesses. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:12 am by Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang, Xiang Li, Dani Min and Jiao YuxinOn October 8, 2017, the Chinese Communist Party and the State Council jointly issued a special opinion on the reform of drug and medical device approval system (“Innovation Opinion”). [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Thorsten Bausch
Thorsten BauschThis is the last post of my series on the EPO’s vision and the current reality, this time dealing with the issue of EPO and “trust”, including trust-building measures such as transparency, fairness and respect. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:52 am by Brian Cordery
In a decision dated 23 February 2018, Cantel v ARC Medical, the same Judge revisited these issues in a case concerning colonoscopes. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
  I wish I had a nickel for every time I heard a student or colleague or member of the bar say something like, “Oh, math! [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]