Search for: "Nielsen v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am
Stephen Pitel, Jesse Harper, Choice of Law for Tort in Canada: Reasons for Change In 1994 the Supreme Court of Canada in Tolofson v Jensen adopted a new and controversial choice of law rule for tort claims. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
Uzel, Summer Associate (duzel@hillwallack.com On June 10, 2013, the United States Supreme Court unanimously affirmed Oxford Health Plans v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:16 pm
Supreme Court’s Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
(hereinafter Applicant) v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:39 am
A Comment on the Judgments in Jivraj v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:40 am
In holding that a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement is enforceable, even as to federal anti-trust claims, this decision builds upon the trend set in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court then vacated that decision and remanded it for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
On June 10, 2013, the United States Supreme Court decided Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm
The Supreme Court initially vacated the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:03 am
The Supreme Court initially vacated the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:03 am
The Supreme Court initially vacated the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:20 am
The District Court of New Jersey denied the motion and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed.While the arbitration was pending, the United States Supreme Court held in Stolt-Nielsen that "a party may not be compelled under the FAA to submit to class arbitration unless there is no contractual basis for concluding that the party agreed to do so." 559 U.S. at 684. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 11:51 am
Many, including Oxford Health who relied on Stolt-Nielsen heavily in its briefing, read Stolt-Nielsen as the curtain closing on class-wide arbitrations, but Sutter (and AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:37 am
Introduction In 2010, the United States Supreme Court's decision in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:37 am
Introduction In 2010, the United States Supreme Court's decision in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
” The Court’s ruling disappointed some who expected an expansion of its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
A. v. [read post]
