Search for: "No. 89-1637"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 am
Rosalinda Wessin and Daniel Pena, 89 USPQ2d 1637 (TTAB 2009) [precedential].Opposer alleged that it owns valid registrations in the Dominican Republic for the mark POLLOS VICTORINA for restaurant services, that it is entitled to prevent Applicants' registration under the Convention for the Protection of Commercial, Industrial and Agricultural Trade Marks and Commercial Names ("the Santiago Convention"), 44 Stat. 2494, April 28, 1923, and that it has filed a U.S.… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Defendants put the number at 99 or 100 while plaintiffs say 89.[2] The exact number is not important here. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
Rev. 1637 (1993). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Defendants put the number at 99 or 100 while plaintiffs say 89.[2] The exact number is not important here. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of Madden v Midland, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Why is the financial sector going so mad over Madden when only Midland Funding and Midland Credit Management are afflicted and in need of Congressional intervention? [read post]
