Search for: "No. 92-1228"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am
Ct. 1228, 1240, 2 L. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (Del.1997) ("If a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence may not be used to interpret the intent of the parties, to vary the terms of the contract or to create an ambiguity. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Cir. 2021); In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 96 (D.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and predicted that the… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
