Search for: "Noel v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 12:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Solicitor Francisco suggested that Laura Peter be substituted as petitioner in her official capacity as the Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:57 pm by Amy Howe
United States back to the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:09 am by Scott Bomboy
” The New York Immigration Coalition and its supporters, including New York state  and Democrats from the House of Representatives, argued the citizenship question was meant to suppress a true total count of people in the United States, violating the Enumeration Clause. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by SHG
On the flip side, shouldn’t we want to know how many people are living in the United States unlawfully? [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, about a “knowingly” provision of a federal firearm statute. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:18 am by Howard Friedman
AP reports that the Department of Justice has dropped its appeal of the court's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Noel Canning, and use the original meaning as a regulative ideal doctrinally, as in Free Enterprise v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered whether a period of pretrial imprisonment can toll a term of federal supervised release, comes from Fiona Doherty. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am by Miriam Seifter
Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued the case on behalf of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Section 1331 gives federal courts jurisdiction over "civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:47 am by Miriam Seifter
The United States, represented by Solicitor General Noel Francisco, does not agree with Knick’s theory, though it reminds the court that its original briefs offered two theories that would help her get into federal court. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:30 am by Mark Walsh
United States, about the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause — to Thursday. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am by Emily Hammond
Francisco (Art Lien) But attorney Noel Francisco, arguing for the United States as amicus curiae on the side of the owners, offered a different approach. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Solicitor General Noel Francisco stated that the U.S. [read post]