Search for: "Nokia, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
McMillan LLP v http://t.co/Qg3hLmt1TO, Inc, 2014 TMOB 51 http://t.co/1sks1olqKI -> 1 in 5 U.S. internet users have had sensitive data stolen http://t.co/2750asDQaF -> Illegal download of a cinematographic work in a different language version http://t.co/YHInN0fw0F -> HTC v Nokia: In the United Kingdom will an injunction be granted following a finding of patent infringement? [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 10:21 am by Florian Mueller
Pender entered an "Initial Determination Granting Respondent HTC America, Inc.' [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:23 am by Florian Mueller
The fifth one of seven legislative recommendations made by the White House Task Force on High-Tech Patent Issues in June was to "[c]hange the ITC standard for obtaining an injunction to better align it with the traditional four-factor test in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:09 am by Florian Mueller
Marcus Grosch, Daimler's lead counsel in the Nokia and, according to Juve Patent, also the Sharp cases, is going to give Nokia a run for the money. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Judge James Ware, the author of yesterday’s case of the day, is back today in Ex Parte Apple Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 7:36 am
(up 4%); Nokia (up 14%), and Seiko Epson (up 2 patents). [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 11:09 am by Florian Mueller
Sceptre, Inc. in the Central District of California, to a 1999 decision by the FTC (In Re Summit Technology, Inc.), and a DOJ paper according to which certain pool agreements require antitrust scrutiny. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by Kathryn Rubino
* The antitrust battle between Apple and Nokia has heated up. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:57 am by Eric Schweibenz
In the complaint, FlashPoint alleges that Nokia Corp. and Nokia, Inc. import, sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation the Nokia 5230 Nuron device that infringes certain claims of the ‘606, ‘816 and ‘769 patents. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Nokia contended that its intervention would “streamline and simplify” the litigation because Nokia had “[t]he technical know-how. [read post]
Background This case arises out of AT&T’s 1996 spin-off into three independent businesses, including AT&T Corp., NCR Corporation, and NS-MPG Inc.[2]  Those three companies entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement (“SDA”), which was amended on March 29, 1996.[3]  After a series of name changes, NS-MPG is now known as Nokia of America Corporation.[4]   As successor to certain of AT&T’s businesses, Nokia is… [read post]