Search for: "North Dakota v. Martin" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
North Dakota, 579 U.S. __ , 136 S.Ct. 2160 (2016), when police seek a sample of a person’s blood, the 4th Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:30 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 40614 (D ND, March 30, 2015), a North Dakota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
City of Philadelphia (Injury in fact standing doctrine) Martin v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
" (Remarks by President Trump at South Dakota’s 2020 Mount Rushmore Fireworks Celebration | Keystone, South Dakota )Destruction of Religion Images (Icons) in Zurich, 1524 / Creative CommonsThis was the narrative around which President Trump sought to understand the times, and with which he sought as well to motivate not just resistance but also a pro-active campaign to restore the American narrative to its glories as he envisions it (the full text of the address is… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:29 pm by Glenn Reynolds
North Dakota (full disclosure: I consulted for the winning side) — having to comply with vast numbers of state (and local) sales tax rates and, worse, classification schemes, is a burden on interstate commerce. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Lederle Laboratories, 732 P.2d 297, 306-07 (Idaho 1987).Illinois: Martin v. [read post]