Search for: "Norton v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 10:41 am
”But consistent with the theme of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Hryniak v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:51 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Thursday, February 13, 2014:My post today @SlawTips - Heenan and Hyriniak: Taking Stock(Part 1) Jones v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
The testator’s intent, "derived from consideration of the will as a whole, read in the light of the circumstances surrounding its execution" (Norton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
A decision by the Quebec Superior Court to authorize a class action to go ahead against Apple Inc. may have set the bar to a new low for certification by not first sorting out whether downloading free apps deliberately breached the privacy of users.In Gad Albilia v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 11:40 pm
In 2001 she wrote of her law studies:Perhaps one of the reasons we felt so empowered was the support we received from female graduates who visited us on campus and encourage us to succeed ... women like Georgia Bullock, who graduated in 1914 and became the first woman appointed to the Los Angeles Superior Court; 1913 graduate Litta Belle Hibben Campbell, the first woman to graduate No. 1 in the class and the first female deputy district attorney in the nation; 1914 graduate May… [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:58 am by Karen Ainslie
  For example, in South African Post Office Ltd v CCMA and others (2012) 33 ILJ 2970 (LC) the court noted that while there have been cases which held that an acting allowance does not constitute a “benefit”. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
However, the trial court abused its discretion by disqualifying the Firm’s attorneys from representing the Firm in all pretrial phases of the litigation without making any findings as to how their continued behind-the-scenes activities preceding trial would undermine the purposes of the advocate-witness rule.'” “It was Stanislaus Superior Court Judge John D. [read post]