Search for: "Note v. U. S" Results 81 - 100 of 4,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2019, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the interesting question addressed not for the first time by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Marcy Friedman in Quazzo v 9 Charlton Street Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 30097(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 10, 2019]. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
As this excerpt from the opinion’s syllabus notes, the Court’s decision was based primarily on its earlier decision in Freytag v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:07 am
" Additionally, K-V notes that its business's survival depends on the success of Makena®, whereas the proposed respondents compound many other products and will survive if they are unable to compound Makena® during the exclusivity period. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
S. waters 'provided the activity does not result in the loss of greater than ½ acre of U. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”The Appellate Division annulled Teacher's termination and the summer 2011 U-rating and then remanded the  matter to DOE for completion of its final review of the second U-rating for the 2011-2012 school year [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:40 pm by blogarbadmin
Supp. 2d 21 (D.D.C. 2011) at  denying the Republic of Argentina’s motion to vacate and granting BG Group’s cross-motion to confirm, the Final Award rendered against the Republic in the international investment arbitration case of BG Group PLC v The Republic of Argentina, and vacated said Award (Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
The post U Can’t Do This* appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]