Search for: "OJ Basics" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2024, 1:13 pm by Kevin
Edgar Hoover This was after Simpson’s 2007 arrest in Las Vegas for allegedly participating in what was basically an armed robbery that sought to recover allegedly stolen sports memorabilia. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
By the interlocutory decision dated 28 January 2022 in consolidated proceedings T 1513/17 and T 2719/19 (the "referring decision", published in OJ EPO 2022, A92), Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04 (the "referring board") referred, on the basis of Article 112(1)(a) EPC, the following questions of law (the "referred questions") to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (the "Enlarged Board") for decision:I. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:44 am by Rose Hughes
A critical aspect of the case was that simvastatin was well-known at the priority date of the basic patent. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
In a communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the Board noted, inter alia, that the case bore some similarity to decision T 1227/05 (OJ EPO 2007, 574), in which the numerical simulation of a noise-affected circuit had been found to be a functional technical feature. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 11:51 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Through its subsequent decisions of March 2015, the Enlarged Board concluded (23) that a patent may be granted for plants/plant material obtained from essentially biological processes if the basic requirements of patentability are fulfilled (24). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
According to the record of the telephone conversation on file, neither the main request nor any of auxiliary requests 1 to 5 fulfilled the requirements of Article 56 EPC "basically for the same reasons as set out in the summons to oral proceedings namely that the claimed subject-matter is essentially directed to purely non-technical subject-matter which cannot contribute to inventive step". [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 2:57 am by Jelle Hoekstra
For detailed explanations on these issues, see G 1/90, OJ EPO, 1991, 275, Reasons 6 and 7, and G 2/90, OJ EPO 1992, 10, Reasons 3.3.2.2 During substantive examination of an opposition, that is, once the opposition has been deemed admissible and the grounds for opposition have been examined, the opposition division, pursuant to Article 101(1), second sentence, EPC, invites the parties, as often as necessary, to file observations within a given time limit (generally four months, see… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
It should be required that before one gets a press pass they pass a test on basic constitutional law. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:31 am by Kenneth Anderson
 As has been noted repeatedly here at OJ, drones are not some fantastically advanced technology, beyond the reach of all but DARPA. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 12:41 pm
The first was Sprachananlyseeinrichtung (language analysing device) 11th May 220 X ZB 15/86 GRUR 200 1007, 454 OJ EPO 8-9/2002. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:32 am
  While particular individuals, those whose basic needs are threatened by the outcome of the criminal justice system, will focus on what they perceive to be issues of justice, the rest of the world is busily trying to survive, and deeply concerned that they won't. [read post]
Introduction In two blog posts (here, here) I have commented on the recognition of professional qualifications between the EU and UK post-Brexit. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Basic principles, second paragraph). [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:38 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
In relation to Article 3(a) and whether the combination was protected by a basic patent in force, Merck argued that there were three possible interpretations: (i) that the product should simply fall within the scope of the claims of the basic patent; (ii) a so-called “identificatory” approach in which the product needed to be identified in the wording of the claims either expressly or to the requisite degree of precision and (iii) that the product represented an… [read post]
Introduction In an earlier post on this blog (here), I commenced my analysis of the recognition of professional qualifications of migrants at work in the EU by describing and reflecting upon those provisions of EU migration and asylum law governing such recognition. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
As stated in the introduction of the basic document on the evaluation of the Hague Programme – “Justice, Freedom and Security in Europe since 2005: An Evaluation of the Hague Programme and Action Plan” – doc. [read post]