Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES."
Results 101 - 120
of 1,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 2:03 am
House of Representatives Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity (subcommittee of the Committee on Financial Services) held a hearing entitled “Insurance Oversight: Policy Implications for U.S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:52 am
Senate consideration of the House-passed bill and attendant agreements will proceed on May 13 and 14. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
One rather remarkable memo from 1981 is dedicated solely to the question of whether the Department of Justice could have sued to enjoin the Senate Judiciary Committee from both issuing and enforcing a subpoena for certain files in criminal investigations. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Nine months after he was confirmed by the Senate on a 98-0 vote, Justice Scalia wrote the Court’s majority opinion in Nollan v California Coastal Commission, one of the most significant land use decisions of the last century. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am
The Senate approved McKenna on January 21, 1898 by voice vote. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:11 am
On ice in the House of Representatives. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:50 am
The bill now goes to the Senate, although it is at least remotely possible that the bill could be attached to other must-pass legislation.Bipartisan call for codification. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
They show earnest and serious efforts to keep the Congress informed—including members not on this committee or its counterpart in the House of Representatives. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
By statute, the 13 members of the commission are appointed by the chief justice of the Supreme Court, the governor, the president pro tempore of the Senate, the speaker of the House of Representatives, the State Bar, five bar associations, and the commission itself. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:31 pm
In my view, such practices violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment… Justice Clarence Thomas also raised serious concerns about the constitutionality of asset forfeitures in a recent opinion…. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:58 am
’s opinion in the case and adding that, if she were confirmed, she would “faithfully apply the standard articulated by Chief Justice Roberts in his opinion for the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Back to the House subcommittee hearing. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:35 pm
For me, the big innocence news at the capitol today was that the eyewitness ID legislation (HB 215) got a hearing in the Senate Criminal Justice Committee while SB 122 expanding access to postconviction DNA testing got a hearing in Criminal Jurisprudence on the House side, giving both those bills good chances for passage. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:53 pm
These have been withheld from the committee at the direction of the Trump White House and the Justice Department. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
” Specifically, why did the House of Representatives conclude Nixon took these actions? [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In today’s installment, Part One of a two-part series, let’s get the bad news out of the way first.The main reason for some disappointment over the cases is that the opinions of the justices—the majority opinion by Justice Elena Kagan and the concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas—were not as well reasoned or careful as a matter of constitutional craft as they could have been. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:47 am
We then review opinions of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice and find the same understanding reflected in opinions addressing statutory signing requirements in a variety of contexts. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am
A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since the Justice Department released the Mueller report in April 2019 and the House Judiciary Committee sought McGahn’s testimony in response. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:15 am
House Representatives Peter DeFazio, (D-OR) and Gene Taylor (D-MS) drafted a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in support of repealing the antitrust exemption under the McCarran Ferguson Act for health insurers and medical liability insurers. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
What I think Turley and others are really saying is that it would be inappropriate to impeach a president on the basis of legal opinions shared by his entire administration and that have some basis in past executive branch precedent until the judiciary has declared those legal opinions incorrect. [read post]
