Search for: "Officer Paulsen"
Results 1 - 20
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Baude and Paulsen argue that, as President of the United States, Trump was an officer of the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:58 am
" It covers a broad range of offices, including the Presidency. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
During Emoluments litigation, @gauthamrao & I had a better explanation in 2017: At an Originalism conference in San Diego, @JoshMBlackman debated @WilliamBaude & Mike Paulsen, followed by Q and A, over roughly 3 hours. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:35 pm
While Boeing may be prepared for the legal challenges ahead (after all, their chief legal officer makes $6.2 million a year), we, as flyers, shareholders, regulators, or just as members of the concerned public, must demand greater accountability and oversight in order to create a safer, better world. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
" Baude & Paulsen, The Sweep and Force of Section 3, at 20 n.55 (emphasis added). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
II, § 1, cl. 1; and although he was an officer in that capacity; and although the office for which he took his oath was “the Office of President of the United States,” Art. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Jackson might well decide that the "officer" language in Section 3 encompasses the President. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
Indeed, Baude and Paulsen have pivoted, and suggest that Congress may indeed be a "backstop" on January 6, 2025. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:01 pm
There were only a handful of questions about insurrection, and only two of the Justices seemed interested in the office- and officer-issue. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Under the Tenth Amendment, the states have the reserved power to regulate their own offices and officers. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
That is, the President is not an "Officer of the United States" and not an "Office under the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
So they can't be officers either. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Two scholars who are not here are William Baude of the University of Chicago law school and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Before resigning in December 1860, Floyd used his office as secretary of war to scatter union forces and divert munitions away from key Northern forts, thus fortifying the South. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
See also Baude/Paulsen at pp. 11-16; Cawthorn v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits itself that such exclusions are constitutional, and do not amount to imposing extraconstitutional conditions on holding office. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits itself that such exclusions are constitutional, and do not amount to imposing extraconstitutional conditions on holding office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:42 pm
McConnell (Stanford), one of the leading American originalist scholars: I most often agree with my good friends and casebook co-authors Will Baude and Michael Paulsen on matters of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
Under Baude and Paulsen's view, Section 3 would already have automatically barred such individuals from office. [read post]
