Search for: "Officer Paulsen"
Results 41 - 60
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
As Paulsen notes, this argument is "contestable. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 10:16 am
”According to police reports, officers searching a home on the 1400 block of West Depot Street in Bedford found Paulsen locked in a bedroom in which she was allegedly held against her will, although of course this inevitably begs the question as to what kind of “will” she possesses now that she has been released, beyond the unwanted, unasked-for burden of self-determination? [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Ross Douthat has waded into the Section Three conversation, siding with Eric Segall against his fellow conservatives Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:51 am
As Baude (who was first to attack the propriety of Qualified Immunity) and Stokes Paulsen assert, “it’s not even close. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
How are lower courts—and for that matter college admissions officers—supposed to treat Bakke, Grutter, and Fisher? [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 172, 2024 Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by former office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 1:30 am
Paulsen Jr. stated that “the broken tort system is an Achilles heel for our economy. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 1:30 am
Paulsen Jr. stated that “the broken tort system is an Achilles heel for our economy. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
2) Is the Presidency an office of the United States for purposes of Section 3? [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 3:27 pm
The former site quotes Michael Paulsen's suggestion that the text is clear and that Clinton is barred. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 2:47 pm
Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen provide additional evidence to this effect in their important article on Trump and Section 3, which jump-started this entire debate. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:35 pm
While Boeing may be prepared for the legal challenges ahead (after all, their chief legal officer makes $6.2 million a year), we, as flyers, shareholders, regulators, or just as members of the concerned public, must demand greater accountability and oversight in order to create a safer, better world. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
Enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, Section 3 states that "No person" can hold any state or federal office if they had previously held state or federal public office in the United States and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:26 pm
Paulsen's conclusions. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:44 pm
” Blackman and Tillman do make the odd claim that William Baude and Michael Paulsen in their influential article claiming that an originalist reading would disqualify Donald Trump under Section Three and my somewhat less famous (i.e., obscure) blog post “disregard the fact that the debates they cite from the 1860s in support of their position look back to debates from the early Republic. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
A draft law review article taking issue with Baude and Paulsen, co-written by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tilman, entitled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen makes a good case that what happened on January 6, 2021 was not an "insurrection" and that the Baude/Paulsen reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong. [read post]
11 May 2013, 2:28 pm
photo credit: Lauren Paulsen via photopin cc [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
" Thus even if the presidency is an "officer" because he holds an "office," it does not follow that he is an "officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:18 am
(The other three justices who ruled on the case were voted out of office in November 2010.) [read post]
