Search for: "One Star v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
” The case has captured the attention of many, including Adam Cohen of Time, the Washington Post, and USA Today (video available), as well as the Los Angeles Times, the Kansas City Star, the San Jose Mercury News, The Escapist, and the WSJ Law Blog. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
The Miami Herald quotes one of the detainees' pro bono attorneys saying that "[b]asically they don’t have stars in their eyes about any cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
” Briefly: Constitution Daily previews Star Athletica v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:05 pm
The case is Altadis USA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm
One of the plaintiffs is Hayden Christensen, the actor who played Anakin Skywalker (and, for about three minutes, Darth Vader) in two of the Star Wars prequels… and the defendant is the USA network (or, rather, Universal Television Network, Inc., of which USA Network is a division). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 pm
Appropriate designation of an agent is of great importance, as failure to comply in BWP Media USA v Hollyood Fan Sites (S.D.N.Y. 2015) led to the denial of safe harbor protection. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Further reports, recaps, and analyses of the argument in NASA are available from SCOTUSblog, First One @ One First, the WSJ Law Blog, the Pasadena Star-News, and Courthouse News Service. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
The two plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Joan Biskupic of USA Today details the history of the case at greater length, as do the Washington Post, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, and the Christian Science Monitor. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
” In Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
They're one big ugly glob, and they don't simply want to assist in this process of perfecting America, going on the "unstoppable march of freedom. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
Chamber of Commerce has started out its October 2010 Term . . . by going one-for-five. . . . [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 10:04 am
Wholesale, Inc., 2000 WL 322779 (E.D.La. 2000); Five Star Mfg., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In Heien v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:48 pm
ET AL v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
The Associated Press previews Ortiz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
Federal: Activist Lawyer Aims to Drop Campaign Restrictions USA Today – Fredreka Schouten | Published: 3/10/2014 Dan Backer is on a campaign finance crusade. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
