Search for: "Order on Motion of Apple Inc. for Leave to File" Results 1 - 20 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 11:26 am by Florian Mueller
s Motion for Leave to File Reply to Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for SanctionsSeptember 11, 2013:Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Leave to File Reply to Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Sanctions The above list shows that the parties are already fighting over this at the ITC. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Eric Schweibenz
Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 39 (dated March 5, 2012) denying Complainant Apple Inc. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm by Eric Schweibenz
’s (collectively, “HTC”) motion for leave to amend their response to the complaint filed by Apple Inc. and NeXT Software Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Florian Mueller
The brief itself is sealed, but Microsoft's motion for leave to submit an amicus brief is public. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Accordingly, the Commission granted RIM’s motion for leave to file the petition and ordered that any responses to RIM’s petition be filed by August 5, 2011. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:41 pm by Eric Schweibenz
’s (“Apple”) motion to compel Respondents Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:08 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, on April 17, 2012, Samsung filed a motion for leave to serve a second supplemental expert report regarding infringement and domestic industry relating to U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:38 am by Julie Deisher
The corporations filed a motion in June requesting the leave of the court to settle the lawsuit [motion, PDF] for $324.5 million. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, HTC moved to compel Complainants Apple, Inc. and NeXT Software, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 40 granting-in-part Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to strike Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
The Board granted Apple Inc.'s motion to dismiss all nine counts of this petition for cancellation of the mark APPLE for various educational and training services (in class 41). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Under LocalRule 7-9, a litigant, in order to obtain leave to file a motionfor reconsideration, must establish:(1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material difference in fact or law exists from thatwhich was presented to the Court before entry ofthe interlocutory order for which reconsideration issought. [read post]