Search for: "P. v. Booker" Results 41 - 60 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Michael O'Hear
 Consistent with the general premises of post-Booker federal sentencing, I favor the more discretionary approach. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
As Lord Hobhouse put it in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 at p. 238 'No public interest is served by publishing or communicating misinformation.' In my experience, parents involved in court proceedings cannot always be relied upon to be unbiased and dispassionate. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:19 am by familoo
Pass. clayton v clayton – does it still apply? [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Matter of Lockitt v Booker 2011 NY Slip Op 00382 Decided on January 18, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Wife petitioned for an upwars modification of child support, husband did not show up to the hearing, and the Family Court entered a default order. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:48 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Today’s NYT article, here, about leniency in federal sentencing cases in the wake of Porter v. [read post]