Search for: "P. v. Castaneda"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
Update: Castaneda-Castillo v Holder (1st Cir. 2012) . [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:29 am
Castaneda [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 7:48 pm
P. 33.1(a)(1); Castaneda v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:16 am
Flore-Castaneda, 2008 U.S. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:35 am
Tex. 2019) (Castaneda, M.J.)}, that Fed. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
Diaz-Castaneda, 494 F.3d 1146, 1152-53 (9th Cir. 2007) ("[P]olice may ask people who have legitimately been stopped for identification without conducting a [separate] Fourth Amendment search and seizure" to determine who the passengers are and whether any of them is capable of driving the car should the driver be arrested), cert. denied, 128 S.Ct. 634 (2007); People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
(Id. at p. 671; see also People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
W.C.A.B. (5th—F085713); Castaneda (Victor) v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
Corcoran v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 10:41 am
It’s not “even if,” but simply “if”; that is, the p-value is based upon the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
And here's a third example: Castaneda v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Robert P. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Washington, DC (Richard P. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
Sidney P. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Consider Castaneda v. [read post]
