Search for: "P. v. Kelly"
Results 41 - 60
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm
On July 13, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order in Beattie v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Noting that its opinion conflicted with Kelly v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Noting that its opinion conflicted with Kelly v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:54 pm
In Berkeypile v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:40 am
Citing to the recent 2nd Cir. case P. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:26 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court published an opinion in Petersen v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Statute providing for a “presumption” that a disabling condition was incurred in the performance of duty to be read narrowlyAnonymous v Kelly, 2014 NY Slip Op 02141, Appellate Division, First DepartmentRejection of Anonymous’ application for accidental disability retirement benefits was affirmed by Appellate Division, vacating a ruling by Supreme Court remanding the matter to the Retirement System’s Board of Trustees.The court said that Supreme Court… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:06 pm
In Woodman v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am
Chief Justice Kelly, joined by Justice Cavanagh, dissented. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
Justice Mary Beth Kelly replaced Justice Alton Thomas Davis, and Justice Brian K. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Kelly and Nationwide Mut. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:10 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:53 am
Following mini-oral argument on the application for leave to appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court held in People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 11:19 am
In Univ of Mich Regents v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
., a Minnesota Limited Liability Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:23 am
Brewer v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:31 pm
Chief Justice Kelly dissented. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:56 am
Law Lessons from MAUREEN KELLY V. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:54 pm
The First Circuit case producing this reaction is US v. [read post]