Search for: "P. v. Kim" Results 81 - 100 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
Copinger (17th ed), [22-18], p 1626, n 94 cites the Hong Kong case of Hksar v Chan Nai Mang (2005), in which it was held that the meaning of “affect prejudicially” was wide in scope and not necessarily restricted to economic prejudice, although that was the obvious area at which the section was directed. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
Mar. 6, 2009) (Majority opinion by Justice David Medina) (insurance law, Stowers doctrine, liability cap)BENNY P. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:50 am
Une analyse rigoureuse de la pratique diplomatique révèle des règles implicites au sein de la diplomatie comme champ social (P. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
‘[P]laintiffs like the Kims will find it difficult to prove what happened behind the walls of a North Korean labor camp because the government has made all but certain that that evidence does not exist. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 2:31 am
State, No. 95,188 (Sedgwick)K.S.A. 60-1507 appealMichael P. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:05 am by Jon L. Gelman
” (p. 22)As to the first prong, the Court distinguishes Sarzillo v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
When Dual-Class Stock Met Corporate Spin-Offs Posted by Geeyoung Min (Columbia Law School) and Young Ran (Christine) Kim (University of Utah), on Friday, May 3, 2019 Tags: Agency costs, Agency model, Dividends, Dual-class stock, IPO Spinning, IPOs, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Reorganizations, Shareholder voting, Spinoffs Aiming Toward the Future Posted by Tami Groswald-Ozery, Harvard Law School, on Friday, May… [read post]