Search for: "P. v. Mays"
Results 1 - 20
of 19,793
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
On 13 May 2024, the UPC Court of Appeal (CoA) upheld the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow (UPC_CoA_1/2024) that a preliminary injunction should be refused on the basis that there was not sufficient certainty that certain models of Hanshow’s electronic label products infringe SES’ patent. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:54 pm
The history is found at Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
Or it may entail keeping the details of the warrant under seal, while announcing its existence (e.g. here). [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:00 pm
MRE&P [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
CFPB v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
One distinction that may explain the differences between the Helsinki and Munich and Paris decisions may be that the AIM PI action in Helsinki concerns the question of a withdrawal of an opt out rather than jurisdiction alone. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:00 am
P. 15– 16. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
We wish to take this opportunity to look back on the eventful journey that the European Union and the United Kingdom have embarked on in judicial cooperation since Brexit (I.) as well as to venture a look ahead on what may be expected from the prospective collaboration within and perhaps even alongside the HCCH system (II.). [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 am
“Professional shortcomings or disagreements as to litigation strategy that do not involve intentional false statements in the context of litigation may sound in legal malpractice, but [*2]not in attorney deceit” under Judiciary Law § 487 (Urias v Daniel P. [read post]
16 May 2024, 2:09 pm
— Laurie Voss (@seldo) May 14, 2024 — Dylan Gibbswith Alexandra Son, Ethan Russell, Michel Hajjar, and Evan DysonTODAY'S DOCKET6-min readNegligent bylaw enforcementHospital vaccine mandatesContinuing encampmentsUnionized warehousesLacklustre expertsNEGLIGENCEOttawa on the hook for Uber crushing competitionMetro Taxi Ltd. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:38 pm
R. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
See Cellco P’ship v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:04 pm
LAW & DISORDER Performing Arts Division May 15, 2024 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: • A National Ban on Non-Compete Agreements • Paid v. [read post]
