Search for: "P. v. Nichols"
Results 41 - 60
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Appellant Christopher P. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:09 pm
Nichole Wright-Gore wore a hat to work. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
In Nichols v City of Taft, the Fifth District Court of Appeal holds that the use of a fee multiplier to compensate for the higher hourly rates of out-of-town counsel requires a sufficient showing -- which the Nichols failed to make -- that hiring local counsel was "impracticable. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
Nichols, Faith-Based Family Laws in Western Democracies? [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
” In an op-ed for Newsweek, Isa Farrington Nichols, whose niece was murdered by convicted D.C. sniper Lee Boyd Malvo, weighs in on Mathena v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
John P. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:41 pm
Nicholls, 3 How. 266, 290 (1845). [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 7:58 am
P. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Bhasin v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
[Toronto, Ont.] : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
Bannerjee: “In my judgment, this case bears no resemblance to the cases that Lord Nicholls had in mind as exceptional. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 11:01 am
" Tonda Beth Nichols v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 6:20 am
Indeed, in Shadid v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 2177, 2008. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
This principle was explained most notably by Judge Learned Hand in the 1930 case Nichols v Universal Pictures: It is of course essential to any protection of literary property, whether at common-law or under the statute, that the right cannot be limited literally to the text, else a plagiarist would escape by immaterial variations. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
P’ship, 860 F.2d 415, 418 (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm
This article is by Jordan Nichols, claims counsel at LAWPRO. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Nichols and Richard W. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
