Search for: "P. v. Parodi" Results 61 - 80 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2009, 5:21 am
 In  SunTrust Bank v Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257, 60 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1225, 14 F.L.W. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:05 pm
The court adopted the approach in Doe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
Parody is a murkier claim since what one person finds a humorous spoof may offend another or dilute the trademark value via ridicule. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:15 am
… “[P]ublic prominence does not confer a shield to ward off caricature, parody and satire. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:54 pm by Lara
TTAB Upholds Refusal to Register MULTI-TOUCH Hells Angels pick fight with Amazon.com (over trademark infringement) Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Possible DefensePlaintiffs argue that the Axanar short movie is neither a parody nor fair use. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
Katfriend Pär Öhman (Bildombudsmannen AB) explains the content of last year's decision.* Swedish Patent and Registration Office refuses registration of figurative mark because contrary to morality and public orderIs a figurative sign representing a hand with a raised middle finger contrary to morality and public order? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
On December 9, 2011, Enjaian created what he calls a `parody of a law school administered student group,’ called `LawClosed. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Through a blend of parody, fair use, and keen societal commentary, MSCHF, a collective known for its provocative and often controversial projects, has carved out a unique space in the art world, sparking discussions on the limits of creativity, ownership, and free speech.[2] In the realm of appropriation art, artists remix, repurpose, and reimagine existing works to create something new. [read post]