Search for: "P. v. Taylor"
Results 1 - 20
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2016, 5:43 pm
The key case here is Taylor v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 4:19 am
Denning and Molly C Taylor (Cumberland School of Law and Samford University - Cumberland School of Law) has posted Morse V. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:56 am
Taylor v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am
Taylor v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:55 am
Criminal investigations and the Taylor lawNew York City v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso., 95 NY2d 273With increasing frequency, procedures addressing employee rights in the course of an employer-initiated investigation are being included in Taylor Law agreements. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
If Taylor v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:01 am
Harrington, and Colleen P. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
Taylor, September 27, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
My colleague in law librarianship, Patrick Fawcett, Librarian with Taylor McCaffery LLP in Winnipeg, wrote an excellent article for the Canadian Law Library Review (v.36, no. 2, p. 71) on the Statutes Repeal Act, 2008.I also wrote about this act in a 2008 post. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
Charles Ghankay Taylor (SCSL), with introductory note by Erin Louise PalmerBlue Ridge Investments, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
My supplemental briefing in that case was uncannily prescient of parts of Taylor v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:55 pm
On May 20, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court closed Taylor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:49 am
Rick linked to the coverage of the federal district court’s decision in Greene v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:37 am
Blaming Judge for Stripping Jurors of Their Humanity, 9th Overturns Conviction :: Taylor v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:41 pm
Sandell v Taylor-Listug (California Court of Appeals No. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:50 am
Taylor v Taylor 2011 NY Slip Op 03049 Decided on April 12, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The supreme court denied husband’s motion for a downward modification of child support and maintenance and held husband in contempt for failure to pay arrears. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Here is the abstract: In Graham v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:05 pm
Dudelzak’s affirmations were not in admissible form because they were not affirmed by someone with personal knowledge of the facts (see Taylor v Flaherty, 65 AD3d 1328; see also Luna v Mann, 58 AD3d 699, 700; Washington v Mendoza, 57 AD3d 972). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
In the case of HM Advocate v P an interview took place, which, it is accepted, was in violation of the Article 6 rights of the suspect, in that it was absent legal assistance. [read post]
