Search for: "P. v. Vu"
Results 1 - 20
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2023, 7:21 am
If my blogging on this topic has a sense of déjà vu, my apologies. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:35 pm
J’ai parlé de sa naissance à propos de son père : on y a vu que ce n’est pas un fonds sur lequel il pût bâtir. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:38 am
In fact, at the time of this writing, the CJEU has only accepted two appeals for review, one of them being a design case (C-382/21 P, EUIPO v KaiKai, ECLI:EU:C:2021:1050).Consequently, and also given that finding validity of a design and, more particularly, assessing the overall impression of two conflicting designs (Article 6 [1] CDR) is a question of fact falling, in general, within the General Court’s exclusive jurisdiction (Joined Cases C-101/11 P and C-102/11… [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
§1681p).Wehrman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Le policier ayant arrêté l’accusé n’a pas vu qui se trouvait dans les véhicules. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:03 pm
Global NAPS v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:28 pm
Dealer Computer Services, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:14 am
Jediný návštěvník, když ukončíte svou návštěvu, zkrátí. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Au moment des événements, X, âgée de 14 ans, et Y, âgée de 15 ans, étaient amies et se voyaient principalement à l’école. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:59 am
Depuis quelques temps une nouvelle tendance s’est développée et devient une véritable folie. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:20 pm
” (Kasky v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:48 am
Jediný návštěvník, když ukončíte svou návštěvu, zkrátí. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Pénal : L'expression «si les circonstances le justifient» permet à un juge, dans l'exercice de son pouvoir discrétionnaire prévu à l'article 719 (3.1) C.Cr., de tenir compte de conditions propres au détenu qui subit la période de détention préalable au prononcé de la peine. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
In Mass v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Kamina, V. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:48 pm
Ebert, Looking Backward, IPT, p. 20, June, 2001-->Of Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See The Federalist No. 83, p. 451 (B. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
‘The ASA then referred to Revivo Tea v P Linzer / 13898 (29 June 2011), Loan Discovery SA v Brown / 21626 (17 April 2013) and the websites, http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/A/adwords.html and http://www.google.co.za/adwords/how-it-works/ , in coming to its decision that an Adword is not regarded as the “advertisement” itself, but merely as a trigger that ensures that a person’s advertisement is displayed. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge William P. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:18 pm
In 2011, the California Supreme Court held in Pineda v. [read post]
