Search for: "PEA v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am
Hall, ed., Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (New York: Oxford Univ. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:06 pm
William Adams (aka “will.i.am”) member of the well-known music group, The Black Eyed Peas filed a trademark application for the mark I AM at the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
§ 4A1.2(a)(2) is an issue of second impression across the breadth of the federal courts, it deserves more serious analysis than the judicial sleight of hand performed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Morgan and adopted by this court today. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:32 am
He discusses McDonald v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
United Mktg. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Hillary Byrnes is Assistant General Counsel for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
26 May 2014, 11:00 am
That opportunity dissolves if Customs seizes the merchandise before the case is brought before the United States Court of International Trade. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
Brian Pringle sued the band members in 2010, claiming the Black Eyed Peas had ripped off elements of a dance version of his 1999 song "Take a Dive. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Heddon, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), in which the Supreme Court of the United States had to decide whether at tomato is a fruit or a vegetable for purposes of the Tariff Act of March 3, 1883. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:47 am
” Although Greenliant filed its trademark application on an intent-to-use basis, it appears from the website that the GREENLIANT mark is already in use in connection with solid-state storage drives, flash memory, and NAND controllers. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:15 pm
Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
United States, 452 F.3d 1305, 1308 (Fed. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
With this vast freedom, especially in the United States, one can argue that the freedom of expression can be misused and utilized for nefarious means, or to harm others or their more intangible assets such as reputation or notoriety. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
On the other side are cases such as United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
Denniston has covered Supreme Court terms that fill more than 200 volumes of the United States Reports, Roberts points out. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
(TorrentFreak) United Kingdom BBC sets out social network picture use policy (Out-Law) UK Government responds to the Hargreaves review: Intellectual Property is important for economic growth (IP Whiteboard) (IP Osgoode) Full steam ahead for UK Digital Economy Act despite enforcement uncertainty (IP Osgoode) Database rights – Bingo for Binley’s as fictional seeds bear fruit: Beechwood House Publishing Limited (t/a Binleys) v Guardian Products Ltd and another (1709… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
