Search for: "PFIZER V APOTEX"
Results 1 - 20
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2010, 9:49 pm
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm
Apotex, Inc., and the decision illustrates the extent of the effects of the Supreme Court's decision in KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 9:46 pm
Pfizer had beaten Mylan over Norvasc and Pfizer had beaten Apotex over Norvasc, BUT the CAFC has determined claims covering Norvasc are obvious in the case Pfizer v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 9:01 am
In Apotex v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:22 pm
Pfizer (relating to generic Zoloft) and Apotex v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:26 pm
Pfizer v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:44 pm
See Pfizer v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:28 pm
Supreme Court denied a motion to expedite consideration of a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Pfizer Inc. in Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:11 pm
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
" That continued competition is what Pfizer sought to interrupt with its stay application (Pfizer v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 12:08 pm
Apotex tried arguing that the results were not unexpected and urged that the recent decision of the Federal Circuit, Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
Cir. 2007, 06-1261, 06-1261o) Pfizer alleged that Apotex's filing with the FDA of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (”ANDA”) seeking approval to commercially sell amlodipine besylate tablets before the expiration Pfizer’s U.S. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:13 pm
The application (Pfizer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:55 am
Apotex, Inc. at this link. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
Pfizer v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 10:51 pm
Pfizer v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:24 pm
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 8:21 am
Sanofi-Synthelabo et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:18 am
Hal Wegner has analyzed the current status of case law regarding chemical compound obviousness, and holds that "KSR and Pfizer v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:55 am
Cir. 2003).Pfizer v. [read post]
