Search for: "PH v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 1:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
”  (Neither version of the bill takes into account the new pediatric exclusivity provisions for biological products under new PHS Act § 351(m).) [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by David Kris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The issues are similar to those in Ritz Hotel Ltd v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
D4b also discloses that it is preferred, in order to achieve the objective of D4b with respect to sleekness of hair and styling ease, that the pH measured at 25°C of the cosmetic solution diluted 20-fold in water is in a range of from 2.5 to 4.5, more preferably in a range of from 3 to 4.2 […], i.e. within the pH range defined in claim 1 of the present request. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia denied a preliminary injunction in Safari Club International v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The passage at column 6, lines 47 to 49 states that:"The heat source 17 for heating a refrigerant can adjust the amount of heat when necessary".This sentence taken alone directly and unambiguously discloses at least that the heat source 17 is not necessarily operated. [read post]