Search for: "PHIPPS v. STATE"
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
Barnes and Phipps, JJ., concur. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
ADAMS v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 12:08 pm
In yesterday's Hepp v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:55 am
In a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Dawson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
Phipps, 21 AD2d 646 [1st Dept 1964], affd 16 NY2d 594 [1965]). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
In a startling break with tradition, this week's vocab quiz comes from Judge Phipps of the Third Circuit: parsimony, autohyponym, polysemy, and appeal. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
23 May 2021, 3:24 pm
Rakusen v Jepson borne in mind. [read post]
