Search for: "PLAINTIFF"
Results 21 - 40
of 203,810
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:00 am
Employee Terminated Upon Return From Medical Leave The case of Krmpotic v Thunder Bay Electronics Limited involved the plaintiff employee (“DK”) , who began working for Thunder Bay Electronics Limited (“TBEL”) as a carpenter in their maintenance department in 1987. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:41 am
Reasonable diligence/justifiable reliance The Court excused Plaintiffs’ failure to contact Dewbre and others to find out what had happened and to never hire a lawyer, CPA, or oil and gas consultant to look into their investment. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:05 am
Suit was filed last week in a Florida federal district court by a Chabad rabbi and related plaintiffs charging a Homeowners' Association with religious discrimination in violation of state and federal Fair Housing Acts and civil rights protections. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:00 am
” The Federal Courts Rules also have a provision that allows a defendant not in default to seek to have a case dismissed if there has been ‘undue delay’ by the plaintiff. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:00 pm
This case involved Plaintiffs who sued Ameriprise Financial for negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation relative to a life insurance policy. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:00 pm
”In this instance, the AT2 noted that the defendant argued that it was not the manufacturer of the product and that J.L. failed to establish “causation” – that the defendant was somehow responsible for the injury by way of its acts or failure to act, and that the injuries were the foreseeable result of defendant’s misconduct.Given that backdrop, the AT2 ended up affirming the dismissal.Did that plaintiff’s case have no teeth? [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Wilmer Hale attorney authors give the lowdown on recent data breach decisions and what “risk of future injury” courts are finding sufficient to confer standing on plaintiffs. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
In Nortel, the court focused on the relationship between the plaintiffs’ transactions and the allegedly fraudulent conduct, holding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring a claim under Section 10(b). [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:09 pm
., Plaintiff alleged that he received an unsolicited call from a third-party agency inquiring as to Plaintiff’s interest in automotive insurance. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:39 pm
The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment, which the court granted in March 2024. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:49 pm
… The Court acknowledges Plaintiff's concerns regarding his reputation. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm
The majority also held that § 285 does not permit prevailing defendants to recover fees from plaintiff’s counsel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 2:11 pm
In our example, the plaintiff may have suffered a broken arm and incurred medical expenses. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:49 pm
The plaintiff appealed the dismissal of the strict liability and negligence claims against the defendant automobile manufacturer. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:37 pm
Mayorkas, a unanimous panel affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit alleging that officials placed the plaintiff family on a terrorist watchlist known as the “Selectee List. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:25 pm
Most personal injury plaintiffs will opt for a trial in front of a jury. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am
Wright II granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in a set of claims concerning ICE’s “knock-and-talk” practice in Kidd v Mayorkas , a class action lawsuit challenging ICE’s deceptive home arrest practices in Los Angeles and the surrounding region. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:54 am
This, according to the plaintiffs, is not respected by the South Korean government. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:44 am
State Elections Enforcement Commission (Administrative appeal; claim that defendant had violated plaintiffs' first amendment rights by enforcing applicable statutes and regulations (public campaign financing under statutory (§ 9-700 et seq.) [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:25 am
However, in the event that your case goes to trial, your lawyer can file a pre-trial motion called a motion in limine to suppress the plaintiff’s immigration status from being used as evidence or an argument in the trial [4]. [read post]
