Search for: "Packard v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2014, 2:51 pm
On May 6, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in In re Packard.[1] Packard involved claims of a patent application in prosecution at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
But patents protect only an inventive contribution to the state of the art. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
In November of 2012, the Tax Court, in Packard v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
” Id. at *10.View #2: Modify CyborThe second approach, favored by some amici curiae including the United States, may be viewed as a fusion or hybrid of de novo review and deferential review. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
Some argue that an eBay v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
Judge Holderman also compares the number he arrived at with a jury award in Ericsson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Bush signed into law a repatriation holiday, or corporate tax holiday, allowing multinational companies holding funds offshore to bring those into the United States at a reduced tax rate of just 5.25%, dramatically lower than the 35% statutory rate. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
After all, we have one commander in chief at a time, and the United States is weakened if our presidency is weakened. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:06 am
Cover of Chubby Checker"Let's Twist Again," is the battle cry of 71-year-old Rock 'n Roll legend Chubby Checker after United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge William H. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:58 am
There are too many variables from state to state to say that something is up on the constitutionality of laws in workers' compensation because work comp is a statutory creature - there are no "common law" elements that would trigger a United States Constitutional challenge. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Moreover, this case further tilts the circuit split in favor of United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:38 am
United States, 702 F.2d 1005, 1013 (Fed. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
Hewlett-Packard Co., 609 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am
Hewlett Packard, IBM or Sun). [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
