Search for: "Pain v. Municipal Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
” Thus, the court found that this case was more akin to its decision in Stewart v Baldwin Cnty. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
However, the Court takes pains to note that it is not, as argued by petitioner, only or primarily the functional relationship between respondents and the State actors, including the Legislature, the State-created Commission on hospital closings, and the State Department of Health, that is dispositive here. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:05 am
In McWeeney v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:48 am
Carracino Subscription Required
SUFFOLK COUNTYContracts
Municipality May Ratify Contract For a Public Purpose Which is Ultra Vires, Valid and Binding
East Hampton Union Free School District v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:56 am
(Franklin v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 8:29 pm
Examples of appellate decisions involving municipalities use of police dogs include the matter of Rosenberg v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
Depos v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
The Supreme Court denied the Bivens claim primarily on a no-entity-liability theory (foreshadowed in the public context by FDIC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
The case, Ag Spectrum v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| BREAKING NEWS Brexit - High Court rules Government cannot Invoke Article 50 under Crown Prerogative | Canada's new approach to diagnostic practices prompts division at CIPONever Too Late 120 [week ending on Sunday 30 October] | Court of Appeal on Pregabalin - Pfizer still in pain, but Swiss claims re-interpreted again | Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for Health | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part two) | AG… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:30 am
The court explains in Constant v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:48 am
On appeal in Cicola v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:40 am
Even during the evening, your town Municipal Court or Superior Court can issue a Restraining Order, which is a legally enforceable document. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:20 am
Birtcher v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
A striking example is Lliuya v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:03 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
There may be difficulty in the apportionment of some elements of damages, such as the pain and suffering resulting from the two wounds, or the medical expenses, but this does not mean that one defendant must be liable for the distinct harm inflicted by the other. [read post]
