Search for: "Pappas v. Pappas"
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
App. 2006) (affirming summary judgment against plaintiff who abused OTC athsma by taking excessive quantities "to lose weight and gain energy"); Pappas v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
More from Peter Pappas. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm
The second morning panel will examine the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2006 opinion in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am
" Schumer moves on to Pappas v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In the face of this traditional judicial lassitude, “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” were all a litigant could hope to accomplish in litigation. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
(Carcieri v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Pappas et al. (2007) find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[13] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[14] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were so large,… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Pappas (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 201, 208, italics added.) [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:24 am
Ironically, Carter did not cite the one case I know about in which a court suggested in dicta that Section 1104-a (d) is inapplicable in the absence of a Section 1118 buy-out — the 2010 decision in Pappas v Fotinos which I wrote about here. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
The court’s decision in PF2 Securities Evaluations, Inc. v Fillebeen, 2015 NY Slip Op 30436(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 26, 2015], invoked in tandem the majority shareholders’ fiduciary duty and the minority shareholder’s rights to be “free of oppressive conduct” and “in the event of a consensual buy-out . . . to receive a fair market value for his stock after fair and complete disclosure and valuation. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
See Vitronics Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 12:33 pm
Carta EditorialJuan Mendoza Díaz Me complace presentarles el primer número de la Revista Cubana de Derecho corres-pondiente a su V Época.Este nuevo ciclo de vida de nuestra publicación estuvo precedido de un proceso de reno-vación de las estructuras científicas y de coordinación de la Revista, para lo cual contamos con la colaboración de un grupo de expertos del Instituto de Información Científica y… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
