Search for: "Par Pharmaceutical, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2025, 11:27 am by admin
” Many successful Rule 702 motions have excluded the proffered opinion testimony of world-renown experts, which speaks volumes about how such experts think they can get away with sub-par work because it is only litigation. [read post]
In the case at issue, the appellant, Shopify Inc., appealed the decision of the GC T‑222/21, SHOPPI (already commented here), alleging infringement of Article 53(1) of EUTM Regulation no. 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Walgreens After more than seven years of litigation, Walgreens, Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The settlement ranks among the five largest securities settlements ever paid by a pharmaceutical manufacturer. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:39 am by Eileen McDermott
’s abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) does not infringe two patents owned by Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Par Sterile Products, LLC, and Endo Par Innovation Company, LLC (collectively, Par). [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:39 am by Eileen McDermott
’s abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) does not infringe two patents owned by Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Par Sterile Products, LLC, and Endo Par Innovation Company, LLC (collectively, Par). [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:33 am by Cinthia Macie
  A Pennsylvania federal judge ordered California to pay nearly $80,000 in legal fees to Par Pharmaceutical Inc for failing to comply with discovery obligations in multidistrict litigation alleging a broad price-fixing conspiracy for generic drugs. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:33 am by Cinthia Macie
  A Pennsylvania federal judge ordered California to pay nearly $80,000 in legal fees to Par Pharmaceutical Inc for failing to comply with discovery obligations in multidistrict litigation alleging a broad price-fixing conspiracy for generic drugs. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 12:57 pm by Simmons Hanly Conroy
Suffolk and Nassau Counties will each receive $13.85 million in combined settlements from Endo and its subsidiary Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65; Mylan… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 11:24 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm by Scott McKeown
Par Pharmaceutical Inc., Nos. 14-1289-RGA, 14-1494-RGA, 15-0078-RGA (D. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 5:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., is apertinent intervening case, but did not explain how it isan intervening change in law to the inherency doctrine,especially given that it is an on-sale bar case. 855 F.3d1356 (Fed. [read post]