Search for: "Parallel Networks, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 6:22 am by Dan Bressler
“Patent Probe Can Proceed Despite Judge’s Cisco Stock Ownership” — “Cybersecurity firm Centripetal Networks LLC can’t halt a US Patent and Trademark Office tribunal’s validity review of a patent that was part of a wiped-out $1.9 billion verdict against Cisco Systems Inc., the Federal Circuit ruled Tuesday. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 6:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In re Google Technology Holdings LLC (Fed. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:08 am
  The court briefly stated that the required customer premises equipment is not physically a part of the VoIP provider’s network, nor does its protocol conversion occur within a network. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:08 am
  The court briefly stated that the required customer premises equipment is not physically a part of the VoIP provider’s network, nor does its protocol conversion occur within a network. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Data Network Storage, LLC of Newport Beach, California (“DNS”) and the Respondents are NetApp, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California (“NetApp”), Dell, Inc. of Round Rock, Texas (“Dell”), Xyratex, Ltd. of Fremont, California, Xyratex International Inc. of West Sacramento, California, Xyratex (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd of Malaysia, Dot Hill Systems Corp. of Longmont, Colorado, International Business… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:27 am by WSLL
., ORBITZ, LLC, AND TRIP NETWORK, INC. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:40 am by John Lewis
Recently, a number of former interns who sued Gawker Media LLC and its owner Nick Denton (Gawker) for wage and hour claims repeatedly sought court approval to distribute court-authorized notice of the action through social media. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:45 pm by Scott McKeown
DISH Network LLC, 1-13-cv-02066 (DDE 2021-08-16, Order), (here) the Court granted the defendants’ motions for attorney fees under § 285 but stopped short of awarding them for IPR proceedings. [read post]