Search for: "Parker v. Downing"
Results 161 - 180
of 491
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
The Texas Supreme Court, for example, has a pending case, Parker v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
My dad didn’t get married until he was 40 and had spent almost an entire career in the Navy, including serving in WWII and Korea, before settling down. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
Colonel Tom Parker was an honorary colonel in the Louisiana Militia (so designated by Gov. [read post]
14 May 2017, 6:19 am
Older and injured at work workers in Kentucky recently received a major win from the Kentucky Supreme Court in Parker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:42 pm
See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
He complained at length about the supermarket down the street that sold mostly groceries, but also household items at discounted prices. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:50 am
Unlike Thomas, O’Connor would have struck down “economic development” takings without also reversing the Court’s 1954 decision in Berman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:56 am
The case is Urbina v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:52 am
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania last month issued its decision in Kiskadden v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
In Russell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
In Russell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Parker v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm
Nonetheless, the Board is incorrect that the active-supervision requirement should be watered down, for the following two reasons. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
And while such bodies may benefit from the immunity recognized in Parker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
It is sufficient for the claimant to be affected by the court's determination: see Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union[2009] EWCA Civ 387, [2010] 1 WLR 318 at [120] (Aikens LJ), Feetum v Levy [2005] EWCA Civ 1601, [2006] Ch 585 at [82] (Jonathan Parker LJ) and Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 270, [2012] 1 P&CR 3 at [44] (Mummery LJ). [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:10 pm
Slides: https://www.eff.org/files/privacy-badger-panopticlick-v-trackers.pdf Video: http://livestream.com/internetsociety/hopeconf/videos/130664570 Share this: Join EFF [read post]
6 May 2016, 7:20 am
The rules that we thought were etched in stone have been changed, and it has consequences for trial practice.The case is Legg v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
YouTube v. [read post]
