Search for: "Parks (john E.) v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris said that it was unfortunate that the Westminster Government had been forced to commission services that should be a matter for the Department of Health to implement; however, it had been left with no other option. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:55 pm
The case involves a challenge to a decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("HHS") to exclude three former executives of Purdue Frederick Company ("Purdue") from participating in federal health care programs. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The recent self-disclosure cases had potential penalties ranging from $18,900 to $192,400 for environmental violations that the agency determined caused no serious or actual harm to human health or the environment. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5163 September 13, 2011 Judge: Griffith Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Public Benefits In a 2008 administrative appeal, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ruled that a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in Medicare Part C still qualified as a person "entitled to benefits" under Medicare Part A. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
The proposed rule reflects the scientific and medical evaluation undertaken by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in response to a request from President Joseph R. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
One legendary hypothetical, in 2003, posited that a sign barring “all animals” from a park would not include a “pet oyster. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
Rule 3.851(e)(2)(B). [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The orders make it illegal to draw or divert water from the Upper Russian River, except as needed to ensure human health and safety. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
An EPA pesticides and toxics program manager in Seattle said disposing of PCB waste improperly can be harmful to human health and the environment. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
