Search for: "Parris v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am by Tejinder Singh
Carvin parried that if one was looking for information about who should get a tax credit (the form of the subsidy at issue), then the natural place to look would be in the tax code, and not in the title of the U.S. code relating to public health and exchanges. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
  To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
After those discussions, the clause in the 1993 contract stated that the association granted Clark (emphasis added):  “eight (8) additional, consecutive, exclusive and irrevocable options to acquire the exclusive right to produce a live television broadcast of and to produce on tape or film the Awards for each of the years 1998 through and including 2005, and for any extensions, renewals, substitutions or modifications of the NBC Agreement . . . . [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 10:54 am by Steve Vladeck
And given the tenor of yesterday’s oral argument, it is difficult to believe that Duncan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 1:31 am by UKSC Blog
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:32 am by UKSC Blog
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:48 pm by John Duffy
If you have become depressed about the current state of American government—the shouting, the posturing, the endless spinning—please read the oral-argument transcript in Thryv Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
As we enter the courtroom for today’s argument in Christie v. [read post]