Search for: "Party City Corp. v. Super. Ct." Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
This Court and others have recognized this, noting that pseudonymity can create a "risk of unfairness to the opposing party," James v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
This prong requires an inquiry into whether the party that claimed to have made the retention was objectively reasonable in concluding that a confidential relationship had been created between the party and the consultant. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Winter v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
These two “core factors” that were deemed most probative included (1) the nature and degree of control that the hiring party asserted over the worker and (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit and loss. 14 Under the 2021 IC Rule, if these two core factors pointed toward the same classification, “there was a substantial likelihood that it was the worker’s accurate classification. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
General Motors Corp 6th Affirms Pro Se $120,000 Employment Discrimination VerdictMadden v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Encouraging party honesty in testimony or affidavits A nonanonymous witness, including a party witness, "may feel more inhibited than a pseudonymous witness from fabricating or embellishing an account. [read post]